Reply to British Women and Their Fashion Mishaps: Part 1

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "British Women and Their Fashion Mishaps: Part 1"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/Remisagoodboy/status/2004196343770955847/photo/1[/twitter][/quote]
I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.) [/quote]

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is [b]objectively not pretty[/b].

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way. [/quote]
"Objectively not pretty" is way harsh. I don't think she's a great beauty of our time but she is certainly unconventionally pretty:

[img]https://media.tatler.com/photos/6141dcaae00e3d8849bfe94c/master/w_2048%2Cc_limit/princess-beatrice-tatler-1-8aug13-pa_b.jpg[/img]

[img]https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CK6MhazMuZNGLjd3JzXZRA-1080-80.jpg.webp[/img]

I get that the York girls are not as pretty as Kate, Meghan, the Spencer cousins, et. al. but to call this woman above objectively ugly is harsh.
[/quote]

She looks like Queen Victoria (judging from paintings of her)[/quote]
She's short like the women in Victoria's lineage as well. That said I do think she's prettier than the average Windsor woman. I know everyone (not here, I mean in general) insists Elizabeth and Margaret were two of the most beautiful women to ever walk this earth, but they were kind of equine looking. Claiming they were two of the most beautiful women of their time when their time had Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, and Marilyn Monroe is absurd lol. I think they were just dressed impeccably, which can cover a lot of sins.

I also don't think people thought Queen Elizabeth was a great beauty during her time? I know Jackie Kennedy made some remarks about her being dowdy.

Speaking of Windsor women who fared well, Margaret's granddaughter is surprisingly beautiful:

[img]https://media.vogue.es/photos/63692b1ebc2dd3218da45eba/2:3/w_2240,c_limit/Lady%20Margarita%20Armstrong%20Jones%20Principessa%20Margaret%20(1).jpg[/img][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics