Reply to Need targets and safeties

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Need targets and safeties"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would ED1 to Carleton or Mudd. Carleton has a lower athlete percentage than Swat and Swat has gone a bit overboard with first gen, as over 25% admits and almost no overlap with their athletes (not really any more room at the inn for the ED round). I actually think Swat will be as difficult or a more difficult ED admit than Brown (but would not risk Brown ED either).

Swat is 29% male athletes overall, and first year will be higher due to attrition. https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/institution/details

Carleton is 22%. Still a lot but when buckets are tiny that 8% will make a difference.

Mudd is harder to say because it shares with CMC and Scripps but I would say it is lower than Carleton…[/quote]

The male athletes on CMS (Mudd & CMC)'s sport team are almost 90% derived form CMC. Very few Mudd varsity athletes to take spots in ED rounds (CMC male ED admits are majority recruited athletes in contrast).

That said, Mudd is so tiny of a college (Only around 200-ish freshmen) so it's nearly impossible to get in at all.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics