Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Two concepts should be banned in discussing boundary studies"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]There is no solution that meets everyone’s needs. Bus rides are important, especially for lower income community members. Families without reliable transportation may not be able to attend school events and it can be a hardship if they need to pick up a child early or attend a meeting during the school day. Property values shouldn’t be part of the discussion but I understand why they are. Most of us have most of our money invested in our homes. We stretched for a tiny fixer upper in Wootton. We could have spent less for a nicer house but sacrificed for the school. If school boundaries change, we will lose money we really can’t afford to lose. Do I think the BOE should care and factor that in? No. But I see why it’s hard for families to ignore. I’ve long believed that all children have the right to a good education. They also have the right to safe school buildings. We are where we are because MCPS ignored decaying buildings for decades. There’s really no excuse. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics