Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Fed Employees- Asset allocation given pension "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Look at the allocation of L2040. The life cycle funds are based on your retirement year, and they allocate the funds in a way that’s appropriate for the year of your retirement. https://www.tsp.gov/funds-lifecycle/[/quote] yeah but fees are pretty high compared to CSI. i don't know if the money managers who came up with L funds factored in pension and SS in their allocations. [/quote] You don’t know what you are talking about. The S fund is the most expensive fund at .051%, or $51 per 100,000. The L funds basically charge a blended fee which reflects the costs of the other funds— meaning they cost between .037 and .040%. Also the whole point of FERS retirement benefits is that they were designed as a “three legged stool” (as opposed to the CSRS stand alone pension)— annuity, TSP and SS. The idea that TSP ignored SS and FERS annuities when designing L funds is ridiculous. [/quote] You are correct. I stand corrected re. L fund fees. L fund used to be significantly higher (per my memory) than CSI but now I see they are comparable. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics