Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Sugar Dating"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women were property. They had to exchange things to get shelter and goods of their own. In the 1970s and 1980s women started working for pay en masse. Since the 1970s, some average/middle income women accumulated money to spend freely (eg discretionary spending). As a response, some men have reacted by getting in on the game — and exchanging their services (attention / affection /car repairs) for women. They receive money, goods and other not-easily-monetized services. You can substitute any gender / orientation into this common and age-old scenario [/quote] That’s just not true. Women worked together with men since the beginning of humanity. It is the wealth accumulation in capitalism era allowed some men to take women as property [/quote] Ok… Capitalism era is a very long time. Are you talking Adam Smith era? Either way this exchange is not new -/ and I don’t think people should continue to feign shock and express judgement. It’s silly [/quote] Somewhere since 15th century women could become wives and work for the household if upper society. Most still worked . Prostitution was very limited, considered against morals and contained. it’s not like women were selling themselves en masse as a gender and the men were buying en masse. My great grandmother was working fields while married so were most other women in her village. [/quote] Is this like a “Brigerton” but in 15th Century Europe? Are you sure? Working in field … um, okay. I am sure that was a all hands on deck enterprise … including children. Animals too, to pull things (children were used to push and pull things). You are sort of bring up other issues here. I can’t follow [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics