Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "NYT articles on fetal monitoring, increase in c-sections and rise in severe complication "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I gave birth to my first 20 years ago and this was a thing then. The system sucks and women pay [/quote] The system is designed to keep women alive, and if you look over the course of history, the current one does a very very very good job. They may overprescribe c-sections but it’s 10000% better than the alternative. When you find the solution that strikes the *perfect* balance you go ahead and let us know! [/quote] The problem is that in many cases, current policies aren’t evidence based. We’ve known for a while that constant fetal monitoring (not intermittent) increases the risk of C-sections without improving outcomes. The way we handle baby size is bizarre. Yes, large babies can cause delivery issues. However: ultrasound measurements do not accurately predict who will have those issues, but they do increase the chance of C-section.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
