Reply to Does the MCPS proposal for zero additional teachers at programs hold water?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Does the MCPS proposal for zero additional teachers at programs hold water?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Correct me if I am wrong but MCPS is not recreating SMCS at 4 more schools.  They are launching STEM programs.  We have no idea how close that will be to the existing SMCS.   [b] 9 period day? Block Scheduling? Functions?  Organic Chemistry?  Math Phys?[/b]  [/quote]

The bolded parts do not present in the STEM program. For transportation, the 9th period is eliminated. Math starts at algebra 2, so grade 10 will be precalc. As function covers both, it will be gone. Organic chemistry, if there’s one in the future, will likely be moved to the biomedical science program. Don’t think about math physics. Right now it can only collect enough enrollment every other year.

The top students will compete more on ECs with their own resources as they cannot differentiate through choosing more challenged classes.

[/quote]

So STEM is the normal college bound path with maybe a few extra CS electives.  No need for highly trained staff.  [/quote]

Yes. MCPS calls it STEM from the very beginning because they know clearly they cannot replicate 6 SMCS. They lie on repeatedly saying Blair SMCS will not be gone. But now you can see it’ll be replaced by the new mediocre STEM program. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics