Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Do not waste ED on a SLAC. Very few unhooked (non-athlete, non-FGLI, non-legacy/donor) get in."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]... also Pomon and CMC have lower athletic numbers. It may help there. I think it does help with CMC from our HS. [/quote] Pomona is low comparatively, but CMC has very HIGH athlete numbers (351 males across only 696 male students over all 4 year's of classes) - CMC's numbers are 50% varsity athletes for males. I absolutely would not ED to CMC if my DS was unhooked and not a recruited athlete. Also, I imagine the freshman (recruited athlete) numbers would be even a higher proportion than seniors when they drop off. CMS for women ED non-athlete is better since they share a team with Scripps which is an all-women college that has a fair proportion of athletes. Harvey Mudd has very few recruited athletes and contributes very little to CMS joint team. Pomona shares with Pitzer and Pitzer pulls it's own weight. Pomona has fewer varsity athletes than CMC despite being nearly double its size. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
