Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The right wing fighting a fantasy war over sorority dances"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait. [/quote] People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life. [/quote] Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that. [/quote] Either you didn’t see the ad that had “GENES” crossed out and replaced with the word “JEANS” — or you saw it and didn’t understand the implications. (NP) [/quote] I agree it was about genetics because its a fun play on words. I don't see how Sydney talking about her genes is a call to arms to murder all non-blondes. You know, you never see hot people getting upset about someone being proud of their looks. I'm just saying. You all are telling on yourselves, you got mad that she's hot and now you're pretending she's promoting advocating to abort all black babies or whatever. GTFO. [/quote] At the same age as Sydney Sweeney is now, I (white blue-eyed blonde) was significantly hotter and beautiful, which she is not. I thought the ad was appalling. It was not her “celebrating” her looks. It was a not-at-all subtle suggestion of white supremacy and in the current political environment, extremely obnoxious. Smart ad execs got what they wanted - people talking about their ad. Thing is they ultimately failed because most folks have forgotten or never knew what brand was advertising. MAGA that recall the brand will probably not buy the jeans because it’s not their demographic/out of their price range/too fancy. Liberals who know the brand will not chose it because of the racist implications. Bottom line, its a failure for the brand either way and they will drop that advertising agency.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics