Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Assault weapons are for the Military only"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honestly, the "Bushmaster" used to pump 3-11 exploding bullets each into those 20 six year old children is a military weapon, and has no purpose outside of war. It's sale to the public is a violation of its ATF approval( hope lawyers are looking at this angle) . quote] [b] Ammunition for sale in the US does not "explode". :-)[/b] [b]Read the coroner's report, asshole[/b] Oh, and the military is not allowed to act as a police or arme militia within the borders. Nancy was sold a legal assault weapon which she did not maintain control of or access to. If anybody needs to be sued, it is her estate. I don't know any preppers and I may think that they are a little eccentric, however, I am not sure that they are by definition 'crazy.'[/quote][/quote] "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." If you weren't so threatened by my points , you would not have responded. I will say it again: the weapon used by the Beltway sniper, in Aurora and to kill the 20 six year old children in Newton is a weapon of war, the ammo designed to fit it is specifically designed to cause mass hemorrhage, which is why hunters don't use this ammo to hunt ( it woud destroy the meat) In war, this type of weapon and ammo allows our soldiers to kill at a cheaper cost per bullet. The NRA's position is that these war weapons should be avaiable to untrained and unsupervised civilans with no back ground checks. All branches of our US military screen back grounds of applicants, put them through rigorous physical and mental training, then only allow them to fire weapons under strict supervision of the chain of command. The NRA, in contrast, wants to continue to make it possible for civilians to buy these war weapons, and fire them in a civil society with NO SUPERVISION< NO BACK GROUND CHECK and NO TRAINING. THAT is what the NRA and Gun Owners of America want: as many sales of war weapons to untrained, unsupervised Amerocans as possible. Why? One, they want the $$$$ from the sales. Two, many are promoting gun sales on these "prepper" websites because they are racists and feel very threatened by the fact that our current President has more melanin in hi skin than they do. Sir or Ma'am. You are arguing from a point of ignorance an emotion. This is not your fault. You simply don't know what you don't know. It is never a good idea to argue from an emotional bias. Far batter to use emotion to hone your argument than be the basis for said argument. However, throwing colorful metaphors around when you are wrong, simply leads people to believe you are a rube. Bullets fired out of rifles and handguns simply do not explode (Geneva convention). Grenades explode. But they are not fired from the barrels of handguns. The bullets which were tragically used in this event did not explode. [/quote] So she doesn't exactly know what Hollow points are. Thats not emotion, just technical. Hollow points are scary. [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics