Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "What the percentage of Fed workers who have been laid off?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Mine didn’t even get rid of people who were on pips or had conduct warnings over the past year. I feel personally victimized by this because I have one person and it’s consuming my life having to document her and work with HR nonstop. She’s done no work for months and months. She’s not even showing up to the office. It was easier under the last administration to fire someone. I didn’t have to do pre PIP warnings. I placed them on a PIP, they still did no work, and then we immediately fired. We’ve had no RIFs or firings, just DRP[/quote] If you have someone that isn't showing up and isn't doing any work, you should be able to fire them for behavior issues and not based on performance without doing the whole PIP business. The PIP is for performance issues. You should talk to your agency lawyers, not your HR. The lawyers are better versed in the options available to you than HR is. In my experience, no one in HR had ever actually fired anyone and didn't know how to do it. [/quote] I’m working both performance and conduct sides and still can’t fire. Every time we issue something new, the employee claims a new health issue which starts a long process. I’m incredibly sympathetic to health issues but it’s gone on way too long. I’m working with the same HR I worked with in the prior admin. There are more stringent rules on firing now. HR is very much on my side. It’s really impacting my own work too since it’s all so time consuming. [/quote] When are federal supervisors finally going to be fired? This excuse is so common across agencies that it's evidence of widespread incompetence and receiving a paycheck for doing minor administrative tasks. There are no roadblocks to firing employees, in fact you can send a request to OPM to fire an employee based only on an allegation and they will be fired within 5 days. There's no union to block firings (they never really were that powerful) and all HR has to do is file paperwork. And please, any claim about being worried about litigation is preposterous given the D.D.C. is a federal MAGA court. Give it a rest and get to work. [/quote] As someone in the know- this is completely fake. My agency didn’t have a union before even. I also don’t know any Fed supervisors who are purely administrative. Most Fed supervisors have less than 10% admin tasks (mine is far less). At my agency, supervisors do the exact same tasks as their subordinates but also have the hardest tasks assigned to them. All supervisors know more about the job than their subordinates. I think defense agencies are different though. I’m shocked when I hear people talk about supervisors who only assign tasks and sign time sheets. That’s just not what is done at any agency I’ve worked at. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics