Reply to New paper on determinants of college admissions…

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "New paper on determinants of college admissions…"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I wonder how much of this result is driven by the way they group the colleges.

They grouped colleges like this:
* “Ivy Plus”: Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT, Brown, Penn, Duke, Chicago, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth 
* “Other selective privates”: Northwestern, Hopkins, Georgetown, Rice, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, CMU, WUSL, Emory, CalTech, NYU, USC
* “Flagships”: UCLA, Cal, Michigan, UT Austin, Florida, UGA, UNC, UVA, Ohio State

What would happen if you reorganized those lists? 
* If you broke out HYPSM as their own group, would the rest of Group A still show different results from Group B? 
* Would Group B improve if you removed the big urban schools (NYU and USC), which are obviously distinct from the others in many ways? 
* How much would Group C improve if you replaced Ohio State with Georgia Tech? 
* If you broke out the elite tech schools (MIT, CalTech, CMU, Ga. Tech) as their own group, would that group do better or worse than HYPS? Would it do better than Chicago?

The way the paper is presented seems designed to convince you that an anthropology major from Columbia is destined to earn more money than a premed from Hopkins or an aerospace engineer from Georgia Tech, but I’m dubious.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics