Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "Indoor Softball Facility Permit Denied in Fairfax County"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]maybe if they add slot machines in the lobby it will get a lot more positive traction with the dear leaders[/quote] :lol: When looking to see when the hearing was, I found out that Walkinshaw tried to expedite the permit process back in February and got the board to reduce their permit fee since the zoning rules were unclear. I do appreciate how much he's supported girls' softball in Fairfax County. [quote]REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE PARTIAL WAIVER OF SPECIAL PERMIT FEES FOR HITREPS LLC DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA) SIXFOUR3 (BRADDOCK DISTRICT) (12:18 p.m.) Supervisor Walkinshaw stated that HitReps LLC, dba SixFour3, has leased space at 8600 Morrissette Drive, Suite C, Springfield, in the I-4 District, to open a facility for girls’ softball training and development. Later today, the Board will consider a resolution and an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance definition concerning this type of use and providing additional clarity regarding the use definition for this and similar facilities. Given the unusual circumstances, and that the Board will be asked to consider amendments to clarify the use definition, Supervisor Walkinshaw stated his belief that a partial fee waiver is warranted. Therefore, Supervisor Walkinshaw moved that the Board authorize a reduction of the Special Permit fee to $1,295 for HitReps LLC dba SixFour3 and schedule of this application be expedited to the extent possible. This motion should not be construed as a favorable recommendation on these applications by the Board and does not relieve the applicant from compliance with the provisions of any applicable ordinances, regulations, or adopted standards. This action in no way prejudices the substantive review of the applications. The motion was multiply seconded and carried by unanimous vote[/quote] () Anyone who wants to support SF3 in getting the new permit can still email BZAClerkMail@FairfaxCounty.gov[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics