Reply to Is 14 days too many for London?

Forum Index » Travel Discussion

Reply to "Is 14 days too many for London? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I live in a small city (San Francisco) and there's absolutely enough to do here to fill 14 days, and yet tourists whirlwind through in two days and think they've seen the entire city. Dig in, hang out, find favorite places and go back to them, etc. London's quite big - plenty to do for half a month.[/quote]
eh, DH is from the UK and lived in SF for a while,  so I'm familiar with SF and London.

14 days in SF and London alone is too long.   I would venture out of SF and go up to wine country, Sausalito, Santa Cruz, but I would not spend 14 days in SF city as a tourist. Same for London.[/quote]

Same here. London was great when my kids were younger and loved museums, parks, boat rides, etc and happily did whatever I told them. Rather annoyingly they turned into teens with their own ideas. Little easier now they are 15 and 17 and can get around on their own (and together as 15yo DD wouldn’t feel comfortable by herself) but 14 days would still be too long. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics