Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
ยป
College and University Discussion
Reply to "What would a meritocracy in higher ed look like? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Colleges look for future leaders, that concept is vastly different from Olympiad winners. Olympia competition is limited to math, physics, chemistry, biology, information science. Limiting seats to Olympia winners is an extremely weird idea. The majority of math Olympia winners end up at Jane Street and Citadel. Do we want that for our society as a whole? Naw. I think, if anything, we should exclude these Olympia people from the top colleges. They are free to attend state universities and such. [/quote] I don't even see how these people envision humanities admissions would work. The best writers aren't always the ones from Kenyon writing who had many opportunities at Philips Exeter to get their writing into the "MFA style." Some people have fascinating talent that just needs practice and training. Most high schools don't offer substantial training in sociology, philosophy, anthropology, classics, or religious studies, so how would we go about questioning them on Tertullian and Radegund when they have no idea what the concept of hermeticism is? I'm also deeply wary about the assumptions that our best STEM talent is solely in the top x% of olympiad winners. Many schools don't even have access to the olympiads, and that type of examination skews towards a certain demographic (highly educated parents). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics