Reply to MAHA report

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "MAHA report"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here is a search page of just this forum going back to 2019. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/jforum.page?module=search&action=search&search_keywords=PFAS&search_in=&search_forum=39&sort_by=time&groupByForum=false&start=175

Here is from the main forums, with results going back to 2015 
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/jforum.page?module=search&action=search&search_keywords=PFAS&match_type=all&search_forum=&sort_by=time&sort_dir=ASC
[/quote]

8 pages of results with 185 citations since 2019, with the vast majority of those being from the 24 election cycle or later. Maybe a 2 pages could be said to pre-date that.

The best pre-election thread being: [url]https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1166242.page#26144997[/url]

A thread in which a liberal bemoans the lack of concern over PFAs by other liberals. The consensus is "shut up and vote blue" from the people who probably are now posting in this thread.

That's how much people here cared about PFAS. Climate Change returns 431 pages with 10,765 citations in comparison. That's not even trying to capture all the permutations of the term.

So your concern seems rather shallow and opportunistic. Or maybe I'm being too harsh here, and maybe you genuinely care more now thanks to RFK bringing this and other issues to the forefront? If so, you should also get up to speed on fluoride and vaccines. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics