Reply to What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Against Trump.[/quote] not going to work.  We need more.  The weekly show with Hohn Stewart had some nuggets. For example, on immigration - there is a certain about this country needs to help support social security and fill jobs Americans won’t do.  Quantify that and don’t shy away from it.  What Biden allowed on immigration was just dumb (we now know why) but Trump is overcorrecting.  [/quote]

:roll:

I can't stand when someone who purports to be anti-Trump normalizes his actions like this. You call what he is doing overcorrecting.[i] Overcorrecting?[/i]

Yes, Biden changed some of the policies and, for example, had to spend resources fixing some of Trump's atrocities like reuniting the families separated by the widely condemned and failed "zero tolerance" policy. But there was an increase in migrants during the Biden administration for reasons that had absolutely nothing to do with Biden:

1. The resumption of (accumulated) migration after a having come to grinding halt during the pandemic
2. Devastating natural disasters in countries byond the usual migrants'  home countries and crisis after crisis in places like Venezuela and Haiti.
3. Post-pandemic misery throughout the world

Biden focused on a humane (does not violate human rites!) policy that focused on legal immigration. He also:

1. Detained more people at the border than Trump had (yes, of course, this is because more people were coming but it is such FAKE NEWS to say he had open door policy and even supposed anti-Trumpers repeat it)

2. Repaired and continued Trump's border wall (despite having said he would not!)

3. Started the MISGUIDED and totally erroneous policy of detaining Venezuelans at the border because of their tattoos. The initial intelligence and CBP policy started under Biden!!!  Of course Biden, not being a dictator or a monster, respected the Constitution and required due process so when after months of detention, asylum seekers had hearings, a judge could look at the evidence and either deport or not.

Only Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem et al would send a gay make-up artist, with no criminal records but instead a history of constant persecution, to a mega-prison in a third country because he has tattoos of Mom and Dad with crowns on them.

THIS IS AN ATROCITY.

This is not overcorrection. You normalize an atrocity by calling it that. If there were only one Andry Hernandez Romero, it would be too many. It would be a shocking situation. But we know from multiple media sources and, more recently, the (conservative!) Cato Institute's reseaech that there are dozens of LEGAL immigrants with NO CRIMINAL RECORD.

Whatever flaws someone had before or will have after pale in comparison to what is happening now.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics