Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Taka and MLSNext QoP ratings "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How are the QoP ratings determined? Seems very subjective. For one team I am familiar with this year, they would be at the bottom of the standings for U13 just based on their win/loss record, but they are the middle of the pack per QoP ratings.[/quote] Yes, because the QoP model helps offset teams that maul during the puberty years. Notice it’s only for U13 and U14. By way of example, teams like SYC have 2-3 13 year-old boys between 5’9 and 6’1 feet tall and use their large physical size to impose their will on kids often times a foot smaller. They boot the ball outside the box with impunity. There are at least 6-7 teams in the Mid-Atlantic that use this formula. And I don’t mean to disparage SYC, that’s their preference. What QoP really does is flesh out the quality of the coach. QoP [/quote] I would agree that some SYC coaches have that profile preferences and very frustrating. Problem is by the time they get to u15 and foot skills and soccer IQ haven't improve and have been relying on physicality the team results will suffer. Quite obvious when you look at SYC u15 team. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics