Reply to SAS or BA to Germany?

Forum Index » Travel Discussion

Reply to "SAS or BA to Germany?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]BA is a traditional full service airline whereas SAS is a more a budget/leisure airline, though skews far more full service than say Easyjet or Ryanair.

In case of any flight issues, BA probably will be easier to deal with than SAS, but you should be OK choosing based on timing/price.

Lufthansa/United way more expensive? They have a lot of nonstops to MUC and FRA, depending on where you're coming/going.[/quote]

I think you may have an older iteration of BA in your head.  They have skewed much more budget airline in the past 10 years or so.  I don't see a substantive difference between them and SAS.  I'd book whoever has the best mix of cost/schedule.[/quote]

Freuent flyer here. This is correct. BA now even charges to reserve seats in advance in _business class_.

Back to the question. SAS is now using their A350-900 on their IAD-CPH route, which is quite a new plane.

BA runs 3 fligths a day, a 777, 787, and A380. I'd pick the 787 out of those 3.

But.. connecting in CPH is much easier than LHR, and you'll do immigration in CPH (Shengen zone) instead of in Germany so that can be more pleasant. I'd go SAS. [/quote]

Curious how we would know which plane is better?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics