Reply to What happened to Navy Yard?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "What happened to Navy Yard? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Inclusionary boning does result in more crime (than purely market rate development) statistically speaking. The correlation between crime rates and income is very strong. So a higher proportion of low income residents means more crime on average. The counterfactual scenario where all of the new development units were expensive would mean slightly lower crime in Navy Yard. [/quote]

The per capita percentage of poor people in SW and Near SE is at its lowest point in 50 years. So how could "inclusionary boning" be responsible for high crime in the neighborhood?[/quote]

IZ increases crime relative to only market rate development because it results in more low income residents (in comparison to only market rate). I did not say it was the primary contributing factors, but it definitely doesn't help the crime rates. DC providing free/discounted metro passed for low income people and the income composition of nearby neighborhoods are likely the significant causal factors. [/quote]

You are an idiot. You really think discounted metro cards for poor people are "significant causal factors" to high crime in the neighborhood?  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Thanks for the laugh.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics