Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Something “big” dropping this week ahead at Dept. State"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Here’s how the proposed changes outlined in the NYT article align with Project 25 priorities. You know, the same Project 25 that Trump claimed he didn’t know anything about and wasn’t following anyway. 1. Mass layoffs, buyouts by Sept. 30 → Aligns with: Downsizing the federal workforce Cuts career diplomats to install ideologically aligned personnel. 2. Elimination of climate, refugee, democracy, and human rights bureaus → Aligns with: Deconstructing the administrative state Dismantles progressive policy arms of foreign affairs. 3. End of the Foreign Service Exam; loyalty-based hiring → Aligns with: Loyalty over meritocracy Replaces institutional career paths with political alignment. 4. AI used to draft documents and plan policy → Aligns with: Technocratic streamlining Centralizes power, reduces bureaucratic discretion. 5. Replacement of regional bureaus with 4 new “corps” → Aligns with: Structural government overhaul Simplifies hierarchy to assert tighter executive control. 6. Closure of most Africa-related operations → Aligns with: "America First" foreign policy Retreat from global engagement not seen as strategically essential. 7. Cut Fulbright scholarships (except national security); eliminate Rangel/Pickering → Aligns with: Limiting liberal education pipelines Defunds diversity- and diplomacy-focused academic programs. 8. New Under Secretary for Transnational Threat Elimination → Aligns with: National security priority Elevates immigration, terrorism, and cross-border crime issues. 9. USAID functions absorbed into humanitarian bureau → Aligns with: Centralization and weakening soft power Shrinks independent aid arm; shifts focus to crisis-only response. 10. Downsizing U.S. operations in Canada → Aligns with: Bilateral over multilateral diplomacy De-emphasizes traditional alliances unless deemed security-critical. 11. 50% budget cut; embassy and consulate closures → Aligns with: Fiscal restraint and isolationist lean Reduces global diplomatic footprint, slashes spending. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics