Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Redshirting consequences at Lafayette"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, it seems like DCPS really can't make an exception for these families now that the issue is so public -- how could they possibly justify the differential treatment? [/quote] Exactly - why did these parents think that going to the media was going to help their case? [/quote]i They sound too cheap to hire a lawyer to handle this discretely and too cheap to pay private school tuition. They took the worst approach.[/quote] +1, the problem is that they are both entitled AND ignorant. I don't know these specific families, but I've had conversations with parents at Lafayette and other upper NW schools that allow redshirting (and these are the ONLY schools in the city that allow it absent a diagnosed special need or other extenuating circumstances, like an unhoused kid who didn't attend kindergarten on time because they were unhoused). They do not get that their situation is a weird except based exclusively on being part of wealthy, white school communities where the principals will bend to pressure to break this rule in order to appease them. One of my kids has an August birthday, is small for their age, and has what is likely a special need (maybe just ADHD, maybe a sensory issue, still working on diagnosis) and we were told "no" in no uncertain terms when we asked about the possibility of repeating PK4 and that DCPS has a firm policy against redshirting. I've had people at these schools criticize my "decision" not to redshirt, and I've pointed out it wasn't a decision -- we can't afford private and DCPS doesn't allow it. They'll say "oh you just didn't ask the right way" or "you didn't talk to the right person." They think their ability to redshirt was based on their unique understanding of childhood development, their savvy in working the system, or their abilities of persuasion. Nope. It's because they are rich white people attending rich white schools where lots of parents think the rules don't apply to them. I'd have so much more respect for these people if instead of whining about how their special privileges had been taken away, they'd band together with parents like me who would love to change the DCPS policy and also address the very real problem of the district's K curriculum not being developmentally appropriate for the age assigned to the grade. That would be great! I fully agree with these issues. Instead they want me to feel sorry for them? B****, please.[/quote] DP here and not connected to the school or story. But I am curious and did not know that DCPS does not allow kids to repeat a grade if a parent felt that the social emotional development of the child is subpar for their class? So a young child- August birth will have to struggle in x grade while another child just two weeks older will have the benefit of developing, skipping that year, and eventually they will perform better in the same X grade. So DCPS does not give any consideration or leniency for this case to set the student for success instead of falling behind!?[/quote] It is principal’s discretion at the recommendation of the teacher, not the request of the parent. At my school, it is rare but not unheard of and usually involves repeating K, likely because that is not a finite resource in the same way PK is, so there’s no sense anyone is cheating the system.[/quote] This. Part of the issue is parents wanting the same redshirting situation as at Lafayette but ALSO free PK for as long as possible. And I get it. I hope the PP is able to get some help for their child. But the reason they will likely not allow a repeat of PK versus K is because it's not a guaranteed right like K is.[/quote] I'm the PP and my kid is in 1st now. We worked it out. K was a brutally hard year for this particular kid (as we anticipated, knowing how academic it would be an how much time they would be expected to sit quietly in a chair based on our experience with our older kid, who was more ready for that). I actually wound up rearranging my work schedule stop they could just come home after school instead of doing aftercare, to help support during that year. That's also the year we started working with a developmental pediatrician who identified the sensory issues. We got through it. This year has been better. I'll note that while I get that PK is a more limited resource in DCPS, from a developmental standpoint, that was the correct year to repeat. My kid needed one more year of a less academic setting that emphasized movement, social-emotional development, and more focus on certain classroom/personal skills. Repeating K would have been pointless -- from a classroom expectations and environment standpoint, there's no real difference between K and 1st. Which is the whole problem. K used to be treated as a transitional year in elementary school and was more like PK (or halfway between PK and 1st). Now, in many schools including ours, K is what 1st grade was like 20 years ago. We knew our kid wasn't ready for it, and we were right, and our kid, the teacher, and the rest of our family had a tough time that year as a result. There are answers to this, but none of them involve just allowing a handful of rich white families in a few upper NW elementaries to redshirt their kids while the rest of us are SOL. It's frustrating to me that these families are willing to go on TV and call the media over their individual children being sent to 1st at age 6 (even though, as I've just explained, this actually isn't that big of a deal because K and 1st are so similar in DCPS in terms of expectations) but have zero interest in advocating for district-wide changes that would benefit all kids. They want their special allowances (and advantages) but not to actually improve education. Cue the sound of the world's tiniest violin.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics