Reply to Springbrook HS Staff Letter

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Springbrook HS Staff Letter"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]17
18
To MCPS Admin, Board of Education members, SBHS Admin & Management team, MCEA RE: Leadership Issues at Springbrook High School
We are a small collaborative group of teachers at Springbrook who have written and revised this letter together throughout the past 5 months. We believe we represent the large majority of staff. We deliver this information like this because we fear and have all seen retaliation from Stephanie Valentine over the years she has been the Principal at SBHS.
We hope this important, serious and time-sensitive message finds you well. This letter is to bring to your attention the very harmful workplace culture at Springbrook High School that has been fostered under the leadership of Principal Stephanie Valentine. Over time, a pattern of bullying, intimidation, and unprofessional behavior has developed, creating a toxic work environment that significantly affects the morale and well-being of the staff. We are reaching out in hopes that you can provide support in addressing these issues. Some of the key concerns we want to include:
1. Aggressive Communication and Bullying: Principal Valentine frequently uses a negative and aggressive tone when addressing staff. This aggressive communication was common over the walkie-talkies that could be heard by many staff, students, and families in the building. When comments were made to her about this, she took walkie talkies away from many on the leadership team. Her tone exacerbates stress and anxiety among staff.
2. Retaliation Against Staff: There have been numerous instances where teachers who have spoken out against decisions made by Principal Valentine are subjected to excessive scrutiny.
Observations in classrooms and meetings are used as tools of retaliation, creating an atmosphere of fear where staff are reluctant to voice concerns or offer constructive feedback. She uses the evaluation process to prevent and control staff ability to transfer out of the worksite to a more positive work environment. For example, she will not return requests for references to other jobs or not "allow" or support some staff she feels are "essential" to her team to interview for new positions at different sites. Several times over her time here she has directed her Administration team to formally and informally observe people who have spoken out against her- often these people are NOT in an evaluation year. She has also changed teachers assignments at the end of the school year for those who have spoken out against her.
3. Abuse of Power: Principal Valentine often makes school-wide decisions unilaterally, without consulting the Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) or considering the input of those who are directly affected. During the 2024-25 school year Principal Valentine has ignored ILT agenda item requests and made unilateral decisions in changing the master schedule to have restrictive
"interdisciplinary pairs" of English and social studies classes that have significantly impacted the way teachers teach and students' ability to access elective and CTE pathway courses, among other serious issues.
4. Inappropriate and Derogatory Nicknames: Principal Valentine's use of inappropriate nicknames for both staff and students is also troubling. For example, Principal Valentine has referred to staff members as "babyface" and to students as "cookie monster" or "trouble" and has even referred to herself as "Mommy and Daddy" in front of staff. These nicknames are patronizing, unprofessional and demeaning, and they contribute to an atmosphere of disrespect. Additionally, she refuses to call staff and students by their preferred names and/or pronouns and has purposefully outed students to their families, further undermining their dignity.
5. Micromanagement and Excessive Documentation: There is an overwhelming amount of repetitive, additional documentation being requested of staff. Teachers this year have been asked to document an exorbitant amount of data regarding student grades, interventions, and strategies in multiple locations (spreadsheets, communication logs, and in PLC notes). This not only creates an unsustainable workload but also takes valuable time away from meaningful planning, teaching and engagement with the students.
6. PLCs & SLOs: This year she has become fixated on ALL staff including "structured student discourse" in our planning and instruction to the point that it was a MANDATED topic objective on
ALL STAFF SLOs. Select Teachers are subjected to micromanagement via "target" PLCS which are observed by the entire administration team regularly (sometimes up to 10 people) with follow up observations the following day to document what is "actually" taught. Also, she has mandated that 50% of ALL instruction in ALL CLASSES be dedicated to "structured student discourse". It is impossible to do this daily in some classes such as PE or Math. It is also impossible to cover State and County mandated objectives and standards in addition to this 50% "structured student discourse" mandate. We suspect she is collecting our data for a personal dissertation or research project of some kind. We would appreciate it if you could look into this.
Lack of Clear Communication: While working under Principal Valentine's leadership there is a lack of clear and consistent communication. Decisions are often made without prior notice or explanation, leaving staff confused and unsure of expectations. Meeting dates are often added to calendars or changed with little to no notice.
8. Undocumented suspensions according to MCPS policy: Inconsistent transparency for student discipline & related staff communication. Ms. Valentine has been known to suspend students verbally, use the suspension as a threat to the student- and then excuse or not document the suspension at all.
9. The 2023-2024 School-Based Staff Climate Survey for Springbrook High School, as compared to all MCPS High Schools, has 22 of 33 areas of possible improvement and no areas of school strength.
a. Two relevant questions were question 14, "Overall, how positive is the working environment at your school?" and question 16,
"How positive is the tone that school leaders set for the
culture of the school?" The results from these questions dropped more than 20% from the year prior. These results demonstrate the effect Principal Valentine has created on the school's climate and culture.
We believe these issues, if left unaddressed, will continue to have a very negative impact on the working conditions at Springbrook High School. Staff members (and some students) are feeling unsafe, demoralized, undervalued, and trapped in an environment where our attempts at professionalism and collaborative discourse are met with punishment rather than support or collaboration. People are literally terrified to sign a letter like this and that is why it is being sent anonymously.

We respectfully request that you assist or that the Office of School Support and Improvement intervene address these concerns.
Thank you for your attention to these critical issues.
March 11, 2025[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics