Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "W&L versus Amherst"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seeing LAC parents fight over selectivity is hilarious. No one applies to lacs and they are hardly known -Princeton mom, actually selective. Btw: your kid should go to W&L. She’s gonna like it a lot more.[/quote] PP again. Princeton is easier to get into than Amherst from DD’s school. Maybe the difference is that Amherst doesn’t take into account legacy status. [/quote] Terrible trolling.[/quote] Funny that a statement based on data is taken as trolling. I am a statistician by training and rely on data to update my views. [/quote] Then, this is pretty disappointing reasoning coming from a statistician. W&L has a 17% acceptance rate. A highly selective institution has an acceptance rate less than 20%. For someone who “rel[ies] on data to update [your] views,” you certainly make haste decisions based off of incomplete data.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
