Reply to question 1 on MD ballot

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "question 1 on MD ballot - negatives?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Gender affirming care has nothing to do with reproductive freedom.

Minors don't have full rights.

[/quote]

Answer the question.

Is or isn't a minor a 'person'?

Why isn't gender affirming care reproductive freedom?   In fact,  California and Newsom bin gender affirming care under the umbrella of 'reproductive freedom':

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gavin-newsom-california-reproductive-freedom-state-legislation/

If a minor is a person and gender affirming care is broadly included as a 'reproductive freedom', then this bill could open the door to removing parental rights. [/quote]

Do you understand that some people can hold two ideas on their heads at the same time?  Try to see if you can

"The [b]first[/b] of the bills, AB 1356, makes it a crime to post personal information or images of a [b]reproductive health care [/b]patient online"

"The [b]second[/b] bill, AB 1184, heightens privacy laws for people receiving "[b]sensitive" health care services, [/b] including [b]abortions, gender-affirming care, [/b]mental health treatment and services related to substance use and intimate partner violence. "[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics