Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Pets
Reply to "Is “ reputable breeder” an oxymoron? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]So many of my friends and family with rescue dogs have ended up with really reactive or neurotic dogs. Granted, some friends and family have difficult breeder dogs, too. But it did sway us. I suppose we could have gotten a rescue puppy instead of an older dog to avoid the trauma rescue/shelter dogs have endured, which is what we mostly were worried about. What I don’t understand about the argument is what the end game is for “rescue only” folks. Isn’t the plan to eventually have all dogs be wanted dogs? To not have the need for shelters, pounds, and rescues, because dogs are all part of families? That means no puppy mills, no unscrupulous breeders, and all pets spayed or neutered. What you are left with is ethical and responsible breeders of working dogs and pets. So I got my dog from the source that I find to be the long term solution - a family where dogs live inside, no cages or pens (aside from whelping and little puppies) where any one female has a couple of litters over her lifetime and no more.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics