Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Judge rules against Catholic employer's birth control conscience claim"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hm, what I don't understand is why my private employer has any business knowing if I am on birth control. Prescription drug coverage should pay for prescription drugs. I'm glad this judge saw through the weak arguments.[/quote]I agree, but it's more than just the prescriptions for birth control which are at stake....[/quote] This is just another reason why health care shouldn't be tied to employment. Then your employer wouldn't know anything about your health plan or use. As long as your employer pays, however, they have an obligation to keep the plan at an appropriate cost, which includes keeping the insurer from selling you coverage for things you are unlikely to use. [/quote]A large proportion of women aged 16-40 use contraceptives; and at this time very few options for females are available without medical involvement...so needing BCP ou internal devices may actually be more common than say, needing asthma medicine or medication for high blood pressure....The insurance companies have actuaries who crunch numbers and determine rates. And providing an employee with a year's worth of birth control is guaranteed cheaper than providing for pregnancy coverage /delivery in a hospital/pediatrician for a newborn...[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics