Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "ICE arrests Bolivian man convicted of child sex crimes, Fairfax sheriff REFUSED 3 detainers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seems to be a bit of a he said-he said situation. FC says they never received retainers for the guy. ICE said they said they sent the retainers but never followed up with a judicial warrant (which is something one would be able to find in the public record). So, my question is why ICE is either lying or left the job half done? [/quote] That is not a situation. FC does not need a warrant to honor a retainer request, there are plenty of jurisdictions that honor request from ICE without a warrrant. ICE did not mess anything up, FC policies let sex offenders that should be deported go free. [/quote] Right, but FC claims that ICE never issued the retainer request. If ICE had sought a warrant, we would not be in this position of ICE saying they made the request, and FC saying they never did. [/quote] They don't need a warrant, they need a retainer but it's FC policy to ignore those retainers.[/quote] Ok, but is that a surprise to ICE? It feels like ICE is more interested in scoring political points than they are in protecting the public. If ICE actually thought this guy was a threat, and was motivated by public service/safety, wouldn't they have: 1) ensured FC received the retainer; and 2) sought a warrant? [/quote] ICE wont necessarily know that they need a warrant if FC does not share timely information about arrest history. The best practice to share this information once someone is arrested rather than after they are released. When FC does not tell ICE that someone was arrested for sexual assault until they are released, there is no time for ICE to request a criminal warrant before this person is back on the streets. It is an impossible standard for ICE to meet. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics