Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "If not overturning RvW, how would you suggest pro-lifers fight to *end* abortion?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Unless we find a way to make men as responsible for the baby as what the mother is going to be. Like jail sentences for men who do not wish to have contact and do not help with the washing or feeding or babysitting And we could make it illegal for someone to fire a pregnant nanny[/quote] That's interesting. So when the nanny has a newborn, which baby becomes the priority? Her own or her employers? I guess that's the employers problem because it doesn't matter if they signed up for that arrangement or not if your brilliant idea became law. I can't stand when people repeatedly misuse the term fire. Firing someone is essentially when they've f?cked up, cost the company money or did something illegal. Letting someone go, or downsizing is when the economics or other circumstances require a shift in personell. I don't have a dog in this fight, so th HR experts that'll attack me may as well save their fingers. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
