Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Selling agents in DC asking to sign a dual agency agreement"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]OP here: I re-read the linked NAR rule and it clearly states that a representation is not required. The buyer (who doesn't have an agent) and the seller should just sign an agreement stating clear fees to the buyer, if they decide to bid on the house. including if the buyer should pay anything to view the house . If no fees or representation, then it's just zero. What local agents seem to be doing is trying uninformed buyers sign a "representation" agreement. I received 2 of them: they were for a year, with that agent, and I would only be viewing houses through that agent. Moreover, the representation would not expire even if the seller rejects the offer. What a BS! The market is frozen partly due to this emerging practice. I am literally unable to view properties. I was able to find one owner and they agreed to show, but the other elderly owner's phone number is disconnected[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
