Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "C-section vs Vaginal induction "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I had a scheduled c-section fir my only and it was great. Very calm and baby nursed while I was being sewn up (but could not stay with me in recovery, ymmv). Planned c-sections at 39 weeks are safer for baby, statistically, because almost nothing can go wrong for the baby's health. They are more dangerous for mom than a best-case vaginal delivery but safer than a bad vaginal delivery. The stuff you'll read online about birth canal flora has been debunked. You might want to read the book Choosing Cesarean. [/quote] Thank you! I'll check this book out. Yes I did read up on canal flora and I agree. At this point I just want to minimize risk to the baby over anything else.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
