Reply to MCPS has to rebid $138 m bus deal

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "MCPS has to rebid $138 m bus deal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can we get McKnight on racketeering charges now?

Covering up embezzlement by her staff. [/quote]

No one covered it up.  In fact it was announced that it had happened.  The folks have been convicted.  And in light of that the court is mandating that this be rebid.[/quote]

MCPS covered it up. Read the Opinion. They hid the names of the MCPS reviewers from the court.[/quote]

Wouldn't be the first time, imho.

Check out Montgomery County Circuit Court judges with links to MCPS.  Apparently it's not required to recuse themselves from a case if a family member is employed.[/quote]

MCPS is the largest employer in the state. It should only be necessary for a judge to recuse themselves if their relative is in a department or school involved in a case. Why don't you say which judge has a family member that is concerning?[/quote]

MCPS is not the largest employer in the state. Twice as many people work at Fort Meade.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics