Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Should mutilating children be a protected form of culture?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is this still practiced? I remember that this was common at the same time when europeans used corsets to bind the girls lungs. Someone is going to say it has to be done as a child, because nobody is going to do it as an adult.[/quote] You got to be kidding me. OP is insane. [/quote] OP is not insane, she's making a point/drawing parallels. Jeez. Didn't you people go to college, study comparative anything? OMFG.[/quote] We did go to college. If you think foot binding is any way the equivalent of circumcision, I'm afraid you're going to have to return your degrees. You're ignorant about what foot binding entailed on a day to day basis, and what it meant for women who had had it done. Debate the merits of circumcision, but I don't notice a lot of circumcised men needing assistance to get around on their hobbled dicks.[/quote] A bad community college? The point is not that footbindign is the equivalent of circumsion, dummy. The point is that society at one point made similar comments in support of it, and used similar comments in support of their arguments. :roll:[/quote] Greendale may be a toilet, but it's my toilet, thank you very much. It's not nice to call names, for one. Other than on DCUM and similar sites, I don't hear a lot of people making comments about why or why not their kid is circumcised. The dangers of circumcision are small. Depending on which research one does and how one interprets it, it might have some health benefits. Once again, an intactivist has missed the point, and brought it up again because... you think you're going to change someone's mind?. By the way, is the "quoted" article the one about the hyper-conservative Jewish sects with their defense of mouth on penis action? I have GOT to quit clicking on these nincompoopery threads.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics