Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "AAP still possible?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, you might be interested in page 66 of the AAP equity report from 4 years ago. https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf It shows the mean, min, max, and standard deviation of test scores of kids admitted to AAP. [/quote] OP here. This is exactly the kind of info I like. It's odd to see that for white kids the range for NNAT is wider, with children scoring as low as 70 being AAP eligible (for Asians it's 93). I'm not sure why people say it's the "least reliable" metric? Naglieri is a respected researcher, and on the face of it, it seems like a reasonable test of nonverbal intelligence. What are the complaints specifically? I found this wiki article on it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naglieri_Nonverbal_Ability_Test) and it mentioned that there is more variabilty than expected and more high scores than expected, but without more context it's hard to interpret those claims.[/quote] It is the least comprehensive, since it's only testing one sliver of kids' intelligence. I wouldn't call it the "least reliable" in general, but it is in the way FCPS is using it. It is given in 1st grade, and kids can mature quite a bit between the NNAT and the CogAT testing windows. It's on a computer, [b]so impulsive clicking can be a problem, especially when kids have been trained to do that in their iready testing.[/b] It's also likely the first timed test any of the kids have encountered. [/quote] Could you clarify what you mean? Does I-Ready somehow reward fast clicking? If so, yikes! Thanks for explaining why the skepticism re: NNAT. Makes sense. In my DC's case, although we ran through a few tests, I could see DC making quick decisions and not carefully assessing all the options. There's definitely some test-taking knowledge/savvy that is being assessed along with actual non-verbal intelligence. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics