Reply to Would you change your own major if you could go back?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Would you change your own major if you could go back?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I considered business, psychology/business, and finally ended up in economics.

The major and the thinking process was fine.  I later got an MBA.  There were many stumbles along the way.  But the major was not the issue.  I actually loved my university experience and enjoyed taking distribution requirements from art history to genetics.

My secret love was medieval history but I knew that job opportunities would be nearly non-existent and felt that the only frontiers in scholarship at that were more in the area of marginalized community studies.  Fine if that suits your interest but I was concerned about finding cutting-edge topics that would interest me for the time needed to get a PhD.  I don't regret it.  I enjoy my current career and my interest in medieval history has waned while other interests from my 20s have increased.[/quote]
Medieval era is probably as good as any other if getting a PhD in English or History. Marginalized community studies is currently where it’s at with most eras, isn’t it?[/quote]

PP.  I didn't have any issues with what was trendy in medieval studies when I was in college.  PhD theses are supposed to be about novel things so that's why marginalized people's voices are being emphasized.  All kinds of jobs experience trends.  As an employment candidate, I was not interested in researching in those areas myself and didn't want to fight the current.  Most of the professors I knew in the field were 45 or older and aiming to stick around for 10-20 years.  I thought I'd have a hard time finding a job and switching jobs at the kind of top universities that are able to support pure medieval history scholars.

I think certain periods of history are more popular with students and therefore produce more employable scholars than others.  The Middle Ages in Europe is less relevant because primary sources are in archaic forms of language that undergrads are not interested in (there is comparatively not much interest among Americans in medieval French, church Latin, Anglo-Saxon, etc.).  And the economic and trade networks were less relevant to today's world (big statement, I know) than what happened during the Age of Exploration, with the British Empire, etc.  I love the time period but I don't think it's a "must" for a learned person to have a deep knowledge of it..  There are no other time periods of history that interest me as much, regardless of practicality.  So I have no regrets.  I talked to a high school acquaintance recently who got an MA in English in the UK.  She quit studying the Middle Ages (did not go on for PhD) to become a non-profit manager because of the impact of the then-current Yugoslav war.  Sometimes it does feel like too much of a luxury to focus on things like ancient poetry.  But that is a personal decision each adult can make for themselves.

I would also point out that things can change.  The Internet has made it far more possible to study medieval things that I was interested in as an undergrad when we relied mainly on scholarly books and facsimile manuscripts. My undergrad was pre-AOL.  Also, there have been some interesting developments in archeological science over the decades.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics