Reply to Which type of explicit content is least bad?

Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids

Reply to "Which type of explicit content is least bad?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]On the off chance that OP isn't a troll...

OP, give us some examples of what books and movie scenes you're talking about. Normalizing sexual behavior in young children isn't just inappropriate, it's dangerous. It makes them more vulnerable to sexual abuse when they have knowledge beyond what is developmentally appropriate. The statute of David is one thing, graphic depictions of sex are another. There are MANY age appropriate books for children on nudity and sexuality that you could use to teach your children (It's So Amazing, the American Girl books, etc.). Random sex scenes in movies are not teaching tools, they're harmful and dangerous.

Separate your feelings about hunting and eating animals from your approach to sexuality "education." They are not related and you are wrong whether or not he is also.[/quote]

Yes, actually - here are 3 books my STBXH say are "abusive" and shouldn't be on the shelves of the family room:
Polaroid, Mapplethorpe
A woman's right to pleasure
Women and kink
^others follow the same theme, heavy art and a nod to female sexual empowerment.

Movies are along the lines of French films, series like the L word, bridgerton...

All of which fuel my content for my job. [/quote]

Sex 👏🏻 Is 👏🏻 For 👏🏻 Adults 👏🏻[/quote]

Reading books is not having sex, good grief.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics