Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "waitlisted at Sidwell for Pre-K"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There were 20 slots and 20 sibling applicants this year. K doubles in size - I would try again![/quote] They won't fill the PK with all priority applicants, but rather use about half for new families and half for priority (ie siblings, alumni etc) [/quote] If 20 siblings applied, the siblings on the waitlist could easily be 10 kids deep. That said, if they try and balance priority applicants...that doesn't mean they will pull from the siblings on the waitlist first. If they are trying to balance priority applicants, wouldn't they be more likely to take a new family if another new family declined the offer?[/quote] This seems valid, although I don't think WL movement goes one-to-one with declines at any of the private schools. I would assume (as a non-expert in this) that schools know they get a higher yield from siblings than unhooked and have made offers accordingly. So to fill a class of 20 with half siblings, they probably only need to offer admission to 10 siblings, whereas they might need to offer to 12 or 15 non-siblings. This is a general comment, not specific to Sidwell. Then again, if more unhooked declined than expected and they would be left with 9 non-siblings, it seems logical they'd go to another unhooked than another sibling from the WL.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics