Reply to Boundary study materials float "open-enrollment gifted and talented programming"

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Boundary study materials float "open-enrollment gifted and talented programming""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Advisory Committee member here: we shredded this draft recommendation to pieces. First, we don’t want any language about “some committee members” because we want to operate as a team and present consensus. 
Second, we challenged that “gifted and talented” may not be the buzzword they meant and pushed for a more accurate description of the type of programs DME wants to pursue. [/quote]

No matter what you call it, adding more advanced options to schools where the vast majority of kids aren't at grade level without making those options test-in has been tried already and has not made those schools more attractive.

The lower-income parents EOTR who go to the no excuses charters want higher expectations and behavioral standards, which this doesn't give them. The UMC families want actually more rigorous academic options and on-grade-level peer groups. No one is going to go to Anacostia HS because it adds more AP classes when the students already aren't passing the ones that exist now. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics