Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "McKinsey putting 3000 staffers on pip "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PIPs suck. Just lay them off. Stop making employees jump through hoops only to be let go. Waste of time. [/quote] [b]It makes McKinsey look incompetent if they actually fire en masse.[/b] I went to a job market talk last week and there was an h.r. person who works for a McKinsey competitor. She's basically an internal career counselor and outplacement counselor. Gotta keep the pipeline moving![/quote] Seems like a gamble either way. This PIP strategy works if your worker are actually able to transition to other jobs. If they aren't and you end up having to fire a bunch of them with flimsy performance documentation I'd think your liability exposure is much larger.[/quote] If a few consultants don’t meet performance bar it makes sense to PIP them. If 15% of your hires don’t meet performance bar there is something with you or the hiring process. As a company you look disorganized. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
