Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Boundary Review December town halls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Confirmed one of the things being considered is OOB feeder rights. She did mention that it reduced at risk on average by 2-6%.[/quote] But that wouldn’t make sense with adding OOB at risk set asides. I’m only half listening though so correct me if I’m wrong. [/quote] Each strategy has an impact. Sure Reducing OOB feeder from Lafayette to Deal may reduce Deal's at risk numbers by 2% by itself but if Deal could not accept any OOB student that is not at risk until they are 30% at risk would more than make up for the reduction and do a better job addressing diversity and equitable access. [/quote] Taking an OOB kid who goes through ES and then not allowing that kid to continue into MS with their friends will literally destroy 6+ years of educational progress for that child. It's going to create all sorts of crazy problems at the MS and HS level. Especially if that OOB kid has an IEP. Lots of OOB kids might not necessarily be "at-risk," but have lots of other issues that might make them susceptible to dropping out of school or somehow getting derailed in their educational progress. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics