Reply to HARRY REID-ROMNEY PAID ZERO, NOTHING IN TAXES 10 Years

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "HARRY REID-ROMNEY PAID ZERO, NOTHING IN TAXES 10 Years"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The issue iss not is Harry Reid an idiot, or Daryl Issa's ability to buy and sell Mittv, it's public opinion.  Can Mitt remain a viable candidate, can he sell the Republican agenda  I think not[/quote]

I'm not sure Republicans know what their agenda is. I thought it was to dismantle government, but then they started trying to warn voters that layoffs were coming in industries affected by the sequestration, as if that was Obama's fault.[/quote]

Yikes. [b]Poor understanding of the issue (sequestration notification) and the Republican agenda[/b].

The only people who care about Mitt's tax returns are the people who wouldn't vote for him anyways.

Funny enough Angle actually had Reid backed against the wall. He eeked it out but should have never even been in that position considering he was the incumbent and the Majority leader of the Senate! Funny you see it opposite. [/quote]

No, my understanding of it is quite perfect. The deficit supercommittee deadlocked, so automatic budget cuts scheduled for January 2013 are due to go into effect. As they approach, some contractors (and the Republicans they support ironically enough) started telling people the law required them to give notice of mass layoffs 60 days prior (which turns out to not even be true, but whatever). So, the logic flow is: Government spending slows (what Republicans want), making it so contractors can't pay their workers (which Republicans don't seem to grasp is the natural consequence and are trying to persuade voters this must be Obama's fault.)

As for the question of the Romney tax returns, I think many of the same people who were up in arms over Timothy Geithner's (relatively minor) tax antics will be consistent and vote against Romney when we know the full extent of his tax trickery. You'll agree with that, right? If you even once criticized Timothy Geithner or Charlie Rangel over their tax affairs, you are obligated to vote against Mitt Romney.

The average swing voter will care, too. They are paying more in taxes because Romney ducks his fair share. That's an easy message.

As for Angle, Reid beat her by 6 points. That's not "eeking" out a victory.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics