Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "The Wilson pool is still closed: what a travesty, and it’s Muriel Bowser’s fault."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As to the bolded, you guys literally *just* got an additional high school to avoid anyone being redistricted out of the only coveted by-right high school in the District. Take a breath and stop feeling sorry for yourself. There are zero freaking labor and delivery wards east of the river, you can trade lap swimming for jumping jacks for a season without the hair shirt.[/quote] This shows you don’t understand the situation at all. There is plenty of room at Jackson-Reed for all in-boundary students from both Hardy and Deal. No in-boundary families needed to be redistricted at all. There’s even plenty of room there for all in-boundary students and hundreds of out-of-boundary students at Jackson-Reed. What there wasn’t room for was all the in-boundary students and the 700+ out-of-boundary students D.C. was sending there. Jackson-Reed was overcrowded - the the point where kids were having classes in utility rooms - because D.C. policies had it stuffed with OOB students, with the in-bound Ward 3 students suffering. MacArthur was opened because instead of lowering the percentage of non-Ward 3 students in Ward 3 schools, the city decided it would rather kick out some in-bound (and OOB) students from Jackson-Reed so that Ward 3 had two hybrid local/commuter high schools, instead of one local highschool. The whole purpose of MacArthur is to help the non-Ward 3 students going to Ward 3 for school, at the expense of local Ward 3 students.[/quote] Or, you don't understand the situation (or more likely, like most people who cry about Ward 3 in the same breath as Jackson-Reed on this board, you don't know the Ward boundaries). The boundaries for Deal and J-R are not inside of Ward 3. They're not, and have never been, Ward 3 schools. They are not *your* schools - a huge number of Ward 4 students are in-bounds for Deal and J-R. There's no "in-bound Ward 3 students suffering" because "in-bound Ward 3 students" is a demographic you just invented (or again: don't understand what you're arguing about). Either there's room for all the in-boundary students at Deal and J-R (which includes Ward 4 students, WHO ARE IN-BOUNDS) or there's redistricting required, but there's no such thing as "there's room for all the in-bound Ward 3 students without redistricting." If you limit it to Ward 3 students, you'd need to . . . wait for it . . . redraw the districts! Boo hoo your planned pool construction is not moving at a faster pace than other Wards' identical work orders. Truly you are the most oppressed among us.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics