Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Greater Greater Washington --- Please Explain Why They Have Obfuscated Their Donors in The 990 Schedule B Filing"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's a weird alliance of starry eyed idealists and rapacious developers, this whole vibrant urbanism. I think the starry eyed idealists are being 'used' and don't realize it because they have little life experience or investment in an actual city community? Maybe they are children or just moved here to implement their futurism?[/quote] An alliance of Gen-Xer “vibrancy” activists, big developer funders (JBG, Bozzuto, EYA, Chevy Chase Land Co, various DC zoning law firms) and MAGA political operatives who cynically spin a rapacious development agenda as DEI.[/quote] Gen X-ers are currently aged 43 to 58. I think most people would describe that as "well into middle age", not young. Your beef is with Millennials and Gen Z. Though as a Gen X-er myself, I guess it's a nice change to have our existence recognized, instead of the usual going straight from Boomers to Millennials. [/quote] Seeing anonymous message boards calling Gen X the kids = almost as good for feeling young as getting carded once or twice a year[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics