Reply to small fixes to make this process more sane.

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "small fixes to make this process more sane. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The process is crazy. And the kids are suffering.  I sometimes wish there was more groundswell for small fixes.

Would you agree to any of these? Or something else?

You can't apply to more than 20 schools via common app.

You can't sit for SAT or ACT more than twice (each, if you must). Nobody is up in arms that you can't take the AP exam over and over.  you take it, if it's good you include it.  if not, you move on. I know seniors who are waiting for scores from their Oct exam to see if they should include in their ED. These are kids who took it several times in Junior year.  It's too much.  I'd really be fine with a one and done SAT. or just use PSAT data.

Colleges must disclose Athlete and Legacy numbers in their ED data.  I don't think ED is as beneficial for unhooked kids as we've been led to believe. But  kids think they have to play this game

[/quote]

Sorry to criticize as I know you have good intentions, but none of your suggestions make anything better.

- As pointed out above, the first is already true
- The second would create more stress than the alternative.  No one is forced to take it many times.  How would removing the option from kids who think they can improve help anyone?
- Every study that has ever been done shows that ED is a massive boost at most colleges (although it may vary by college).  Read books like [i]The Early Admissions Game[/i], or others.  ED benefits kids who have a clear first choice, although everyone knows it benefits the college more.

Everyone knows this is a difficult process.  Maybe it should be.  The fact remains that if there was "a better way", the colleges would adopt it.  You can't expect them to not act in a way that is not in their interest.  [/quote]

there are no studies that pull out athlete donor legacy .. by school. if you have one, I'd love to see a link[/quote]

Did you google the book I listed by name?[/quote]

that book that relies on 1999 stats from Yale that had no athletic/donor/legacy data?  yeah, I googled. [/quote]

Well then you didn't read it.  I sure did.  And the data was from way more than Yale, there were 500,000 applications analyzed by two admin professionals and an economist.

Why are you lying?

Is it because you said there was never a study done without that data and then you were shown one?

This is when an honest interlocutor says "mea culpa".[/quote]

it was published in 2004.  sorry, but this is not relevant. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics