Reply to Eureka math. Is it the right way to learn math?

Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids

Reply to "Eureka math. Is it the right way to learn math? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Our school switched from Eureka to Bridges in 2nd grade. Eureka sucked for K and 1- it had some really specific concepts and vocabulary that were hard for me to understand as an adult who has taken math through college and grad school. Maybe I had bad math professors or maybe it’s Eureka-specific jargon? I was deep into the curriculum since much of K was virtual and I was ready to set Eureka on fire by March. I may be misremembering, but in 1st grade it was lots of place value nonsense and my DD did not have sufficient grasp of math basics to tackle that by Eureka’s methods I know Eureka does a lot of non-grade level challenge stuff but it felt like every 5th problem was out of left field.

Some of the Eureka approaches are basically the same as Bridges but Bridges is less painful from a parent perspective and my DD “gets” math better now. The story problems are still rambling and stupid and I hate the multiple ways they have to “show your work”, but my DD has become way better at math.

+1 to the PP who said to learn the Eureka vocabulary. If I’d had a translator from day 1 I probably would have learned a lot alongside my DD![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics