Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Recruited athletes don’t have lower stats!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Swarthmore soccer is full of sub 1500 scorers It was the same at Williams and Amherst maybe it’s different in other sports The two I know best is soccer and baseball and you get a big boost vs unhooked [/quote] All of those schools are currently test optional. No recruited athlete (or, really, anyone who is moderately well-advised) has been submitting test scores to a test optional school if their schools are below the school's medians. For Amherst and Williams, only 40% of those admitted submitted SAT scores and 21% submitted ACT scores (with probably a healthy amount of overlap). For Swarthmore, the percentages of those admitted submitting SAT are 42% and ACT 19%. So, it stands to reason that all of those schools are full of sub 1500 (or whatever the median is) scorers. So, no real boost versus everyone else on the test score criterion.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
