Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Wesleyan University drops Legacy Preferences in Admissions Decisions "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Harvard has such a crazy huge endowment that you wonder why they insist on legacy preferences. And legacy + faculty/staff advantage is huge at Harvard. I recently saw an article that 40% of students at Harvard are either legacy, faculty kids and/or recruited athletes. Pretty shocking [/quote] Helps balance out all the URM kids. Harvard is full of crap[/quote] I know you are on the same side, but how does this "balance out" the URM kids? First, I think you mean *affirmative action* URM kids (yes, some would get in w/o that consideration). Do you really think they are also at 40%??? I also like to repeat that study because people seem to have an exaggerated idea of how many URM actually benefit from affirmative action and actually take up your precious spot at Harvard. The ALDC (Athletes, Legacy...) students eclipse this number. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/study-harvard-finds-43-percent-white-students-are-legacy-athletes-n1060361 Forty-three percent of white students were found to be ALDC at Harvard. More importantly, a whopping 75% of those ALDC white students would not have been admitted without that leg up. if you do the math, that means about 32% of white students at Harvard should be getting those affirmative-action-do-you-really-belong-here stares. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics