Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
LGBTQIA+ Issues and Relationship Discussion
Reply to "US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]As a gay person, I’m OK with what I see as a pretty narrow case here, though still would have preferred it not happen at all, especially since it was a completely made up case. Im mostly worried now that they’re going to come up with another fake case to invalidate Windsor and Obgerfell. And even though it was narrowly centered on speech issues, I’m also worried it’s going to be used to validate other forms of discrimination in public accommodation. Can a restaurant decline to rent out a space for my anniversary dinner, since food is arguably a form of artistic expression? What about denying a hotel room? Or refusing to recognize my wife as my sons other mother in emergency situations? While that presumably would not stand up in a court challenge based on this ruling, that doesn’t do me any good when my family is in the middle of being denied services. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
