Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Chrissy Teigen welcomes baby #4!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This made my jaw drop a bit but I'm very happy for them. At least from my viewpoint, they appear to be a very loving family.[/quote] Who has a surrogate have a baby when they’re already pregnant with another? This feels like family manufacturing, not need. [/quote] I’m assuming it’s the timing- she wanted another and started making steps towards surrogacy but then also got pregnant [/quote] The other baby is older. So the timing would have been intentional. She was already pregnant and wanted another.[/quote] No, she laid it out in her post. They were working with two surrogates because they wanted two more kids. Then she decided to try one more time to have a baby on her own - got pregnant. Surrogate got pregnant and then miscarried. Surrogate had to have surgery before trying again, got pregnant again when Chrissy was 5 months along. Baby she carried is born, then baby the surrogate carried is born. It's way outside my family-planning mindset, but it's not intentional timing any more than using a surrogate at all would be intentional timing. They intended to have the first pregnancy make it to term.[/quote] Right, so it was very intentional. She was already pregnant wanted another. Like I said.[/quote] You said "the timing" was intentional. Considering they lost a pregnancy with the surrogate, you are making a bizarre claim. They *intended* for the first pregnancy with the surrogate to lead to a baby, which would not have been this month. But yes, the fact that they had a baby with a surrogate was intentional, and was in process before she got pregnant. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics