Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Alice Deal Middle School"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s overdue for a change in leadership. [/quote] PREACH![/quote] I’m rather shocked by reading the Hardy thread. The behaviors described there are tame compared to Deal this year. Does Deal’s size keep parents from knowing all that is going on?[/quote] Deal has had a very weak LSAT for the past few years; asleep at the wheel. This is part of the problem. The school needs capable parents to run for LSAT. LSAT needs to do a better job of sharing information with the larger parent community and to assist school leadership, while also holding them accountable for approaches that don't work. Deal also faces very large impending budget cuts from DCPS central over the next few years and LSAT needs to organize a lobbying effort to prevent these cuts.[/quote] What in the world do you think LSAT does? That is like saying the PTO should be responsible for covering any want, wish, or desire for the school or they aren't doing their job...and shame on you for blaming parent VOLUNTEERS for the mess of DCPS budgeting. Question...what would you suggest when LSAT do when we did meet with DCPS central and tried to rally a number of parents and schools to discuss these very cuts, but were met with silence from most and bobble heads from Central Office? Curious, because that is exactly what we did two years ago. Several folks testified, we sent letters, we presented all of this at PTA meetings. We were left with an outgoing CM who didn't care about school funding, an outgoing SBOE member that never advocated for more funding/services in the schools in the name of creating equity across the city, and that is on top of every other school asking for more funds in a shrinking budget. But your thought is that 4-6 parents are going up against DCPS, SBOE, and DC Council expressing that W3 schools have what they needs attitude? As volunteers? If you weren't on LSAT, maybe reach out to one of us and let us know how we could best involve you next time. I hope you have the time to run (remember, you can even join as a community member if you want). I know I don't, but I do it anyway because no one ever steps up to run or volunteer. Put up or shut up.[/quote] What information did you request from principal about out-of-control student behavior? What message did you (the parent representatives) deliver to the principal regarding the same? What was her response?[/quote] PP here: I have to say, your accusatory language and tone sounds like you just woke up and started paying attention and are mad that someone else didn't use their free time to solve an issue you are now just discovering. So, forgive my snarky responses...but wtf did you do? 1) Of course we asked about all of this, but not the way you just did because we desire to have a positive working relationship with the school. 2) We absolutely asked about behaviors, SEL supports, special education staffing, how to afford another AP, etc. These aren't new issues and the solutions aren't exactly clear either (as others have pointed out school discipline responses are limited due to DC laws). 3) The solutions to most of what you mentioned are more people (some with specific training). However, school budgets are finite and DO NOT cover all of the resources needed (not even all of the resources from the prior year due to inflation). 4) Budgets are about compromise- we discussed decisions the school has to make based on all of the stakeholder priorities. Through all of this, not once did I walk away thinking the principal, teachers, or other members didn't want to do something that was in the best interest of kids. They didn't want a school with roaming students who disrupt classes. However, public schools have limited resources and the expectation is that they serve all students. We don't need people to pile on Ms. Neal. Because let me tell you the pool of principal applicants isn't that deep and (as we have seen at Hardy) the grass is not always greener when it comes to new school leadership. Our message after all of these meetings were to have families 1) enroll: because last minute enrollments hurt the school financially 2) advocate for more funding in ALL of our schools- the UPSFF allocations across the city still do not meet the recommended levels to serve all students (despite what right-wing troll articles say about DC's per pupil funding); and 3) support the school financially as much as you can- it helps and is necessary to close numerous gaps in city funding. Of course, you can do more. I'm sure that there is a place for you to volunteer and make your kind of difference. You may learn that things are more complicated than they appear. That all 12-14 year olds are not compliant like your child and many need lots of support. You may also learn that DCPS has routinely under-funded and stripped resources from schools. Lastly, you may wake up to realize we all want the same thing and pointing fingers and asking "what did you do" to a set of volunteers may not be the best approach for having people step up in the future... Again, put up or shut up... [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics